Welcome to Ecer
Ecer asks for your consent to use your personal data to:
Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development
Store and/or access information on a device
Your personal data will be processed and information from your device (cookies, unique identifiers, and other device data) may be stored by, accessed by and shared with 135 TCF vendor(s) and 65 ad partner(s), or used specifically by this site or app.
Some vendors may process your personal data on the basis of legitimate interest, which you can object to by do not consent. Contact our platform customer service, you can also withdraw your consent.
Consent Do not consent
China factories

China factory - Shenzhen Feiyang Protech Corp., Ltd.

Shenzhen Feiyang Protech Corp., Ltd.

  • China,Shenzhen ,Guangdong
  • Site Member
  1. Home
  2. Products
  3. About Us
  4. Contact Us

Leave a Message

we will call you back quickly!

Submit Requirement
  1. Home>
  2. Polyaspartic FAQ>
  3. Spraying Polyaspartic Weather Resistance Coating Formulation Pull-out Testing
China Spraying Polyaspartic Weather Resistance Coating Formulation Pull-out Testing
China Spraying Polyaspartic Weather Resistance Coating Formulation Pull-out Testing

  1. China Spraying Polyaspartic Weather Resistance Coating Formulation Pull-out Testing

Spraying Polyaspartic Weather Resistance Coating Formulation Pull-out Testing

  1. MOQ： 200KG
  2. Price：
  3. Get Latest Price
Packaging Details 20KG/Drum
Delivery Time 7 days after getting order
Payment Terms T/T or LC
Supply Ability More than 20000 tons per year
Place of Origin Zhuhai, China
Brand Name Feiyang Novel Materials
Certification ISO 14001-2004, ISO 19001-2000

View Detail Information

Contact Now Ask for best deal
Get Latest Price Request a quote

Explore similar products

  1. China Effects of Water, Alcohols Impurities Tmp and Huimdity in Polyaspartic Flooring

    Effects of Water, Alcohols Impurities Tmp and Huimdity in Polyaspartic Flooring

    Get Latest Price
  1. Product Details
  2. Company Details

Product Specification

Packaging Details 20KG/Drum Delivery Time 7 days after getting order
Payment Terms T/T or LC Supply Ability More than 20000 tons per year
Place of Origin Zhuhai, China Brand Name Feiyang Novel Materials
Certification ISO 14001-2004, ISO 19001-2000
Problem: pull-out test brush is OK, but spraying film failed, only 3-4Mpa, polyaspartic topcoat film delaminate level by level when doing pull-out test. Request Date: Pull-out Testing above 7.5Mpa.
 
Background:
1. metal substrate
2. Polyaspartc topcoat on polyurethane
3. Machine spraying. 
Problem: pull-out test brush is OK, but spraying film failed, only 3-4Mpa, polyaspartic topcoat film delaminate level by level when doing pull-out test. 
 
Equipment:Graco 
Pressure Ratio: 70:1
Gas Inputing Pressure:3.5kg
Heating:Paint Compnent A: 60C, Isocynate Hardener Component: 40C
Mix:Static Mix,200mm
Spray Month:163-929
A:B=2:1
 
Problem:
1. Spraying test: Spraying by Graco equipment, thickness 200Micro, 2days later doing Pull-out Testing, Rubber adhesive is double compenont epoxy glue, result: 3Mpa. Topcoat film breack from top,  remain thickness on spindle is about 20Micro, rest 180Micro stay on sample. Polish and repeat this testing, result is same, remain thickness on spindle is about 20Micro, rest 160Micro stay on sample. 
2. Brush test: Same formulation , mix with same ratio, brush on sand-blast Fe sample, 2days after doing Pull-out Testing, same rubber adhesive, sample testing method, result is 10Mpa, all film glue to spindle, no remain on sample.
 
Request Data: Pull-out Testing above 7.5Mpa
 
Welcome your suggestion.

===================================================================================================

Hot discussion on Linkedin

http://www.linkedin.com/groupItem?view=&gid=112287&type=member&item=5886129124451311616&qid=40a0f36e-b200-4111-a753-4fdf9c25d506&trk=groups_most_popular-0-b-ttl&goback=%2Egde_112287_member_5886129124451311616%2Egmp_112287

  • Malcolm

    Malcolm McNeil

    Owner, McNeil Coatings Consultants, Inc.

    Annie, did you give the polyaspartic enough cure time before the pull tests? Also how did you prepare the polyurethane surface before you applied the polyaspartic?

  • Annie Qing

    Annie Qing

    Polyaspartic Polyurea Resin/Hardener Manufacturer Overseas Biz Manager at Feiyang Novel Materials export@feiyang.com.cn

    Hi, Malcolm, actually we tested both 2 days later after cured, and 7-15 days after cured, situation is the same, no more than 4Mpa. 

    And brush test, 2days later, result is satisfied, 10Mpa

  • Malcolm

    Malcolm McNeil

    Owner, McNeil Coatings Consultants, Inc.

    Annie, what surface preparation did you do on the polyurethane before you applied the polyaspartic?

  • Annie Qing

    Annie Qing

    Polyaspartic Polyurea Resin/Hardener Manufacturer Overseas Biz Manager at Feiyang Novel Materials export@feiyang.com.cn

    @Malcolm, no special preparation on polyurethane. Problem is not adhesion of topcoat to primer, problem is polyaspartic topcoat cohesion is bad by spraying.

  • Malcolm

    Malcolm McNeil

    Owner, McNeil Coatings Consultants, Inc.

    Annie, I would like to help you determine why this cohesive failure is happening. I will be in Shanghai next week and would like to get more information and observe the actual physical 
    specimens of your tests. Would this be possible?

  • REGY VAN WALLEGHEM

    REGY

    REGY VAN WALLEGHEM

    looking for a new opportunity

    right dolly used in terms of diameter

  • Robert Shinn

    Robert

    Robert Shinn

    New Project

    Annie, Take Malcolm up on his offer to help you. This gentlemen is very wise and has experience that goes beyond explanation. The man is worth his weight in gold when it comes to the painting industry.

  • Malcolm

    Malcolm McNeil

    Owner, McNeil Coatings Consultants, Inc.

    Thank you, Robert. I appreciate your comments.

  • Rene Gameli-Kwame

    Rene

    Rene Gameli-Kwame

    Consultant/Business Developer

    Malcolm, I have a project coming up similar to Annie's. We are using Polyaspartic plus paint chips broadcast over Polyurea coating. The difference is we are not spraying on the polyaspartic. We are using rollers instead. What kind of surface prep should we achieve on the polyurea to get good cohesion?

  • Annie Qing

    Annie Qing

    Polyaspartic Polyurea Resin/Hardener Manufacturer Overseas Biz Manager at Feiyang Novel Materials export@feiyang.com.cn

    @Regy we use right dolly.

  • Annie Qing

    Annie Qing

    Polyaspartic Polyurea Resin/Hardener Manufacturer Overseas Biz Manager at Feiyang Novel Materials export@feiyang.com.cn

    @Rene, is your project restoration or full new system? If new system, no special surface prep, usually, polyaspartic by rolling, cohesion would be no problem. How is your problem details.

  • Annie Qing

    Annie Qing

    Polyaspartic Polyurea Resin/Hardener Manufacturer Overseas Biz Manager at Feiyang Novel Materials export@feiyang.com.cn

    @Malcolm, our customer locates in Shanghai, testing works in their lab, if you are in Shanghai, pls kindly let me know, they will contact you for this case, many thanks.

     Syed Mohammad A. likes this
  • Rene Gameli-Kwame

    Rene

    Rene Gameli-Kwame

    Consultant/Business Developer

    @ Annie. This is a new application. Thanks for the feedback

  • Malcolm

    Malcolm McNeil

    Owner, McNeil Coatings Consultants, Inc.

    Annie, I arrived in Shanghai yesterday. I will be here until July 17th. I will call you. 
    Malcolm 
    Rene, To overcoat the polyurea you will need to sand it lightly to roughen it up a bit creating some profile for the polyaspartic to get adhesion to. 
    Malcolm

  • David Bradham

    David

    David Bradham

    Nuclear Coatings Inspector Level II, Nace CIP3, C-3, Consultant

    If I read the Pic’s correctly, The first, shows no surface irregularity, thus giving the top coat nothing to adhere to! 
    This would indicate that some type of prep for your mid coat may be required. 

    The 20 Micro on the spindle (The Pull off Dolly?) would be a cohesive failure, and could indicate that there may be a mix problem or an air entrainment into the mix? With out seeing the sample Pull off Test results first hand, you could take samples to a lab to have a test to evaluate the Manufacturers chemical analysis (Spectrum Analysis) pre mix, post mix, application, pre-cure and post cure. 
    Most coatings (heated or not) are applied by a 45:1 pump, Increasing the pump pressure to 70:1 as these are not ( I assume) 100% solids,( would not require the pump pressure), as this may in-train air into the mix. Over pressuring the materials would in-fact cause heat rise during delivery to the tip for mixing and heat sink during the delivery to the surface. This causes changes to the vehicle for the material, rapid changes that the materials after mixing, causes a void (normally atomized air) in the body of the film.These voids are filled with any gasses that are in the atmosphere in vapor phase and are readily absorbed into the film as the heated air escapes, thus reducing, the film integrity, and ability to achieve the required end test results. 
    Hopefully the problem has been resolved at this date and time. I see that I am about a month late.

  • Alvaro Zamorano

    Alvaro

    Alvaro Zamorano

    Gerencia de Proyectos: Inspector Tecnico de Obras Montaje Industrial en GNL Quintero S.A.

    Annie my opinion and while query is: 
    What type of polyurethane corresponds to the existing layer (type: acrylic or polyester), application time and thickness applied ??. 
    Now as the lining that you applied recently, thickness you mention (2000 microns) as you applied in one or two or more layers ?. 
    You sure that the existing film is polyurethane ???. 
    What type of surface preparation you made on the existing coat. 
    Apparently the loss of adhesion that you mention is present the effect of "(efforts adhesion) vs. (cohesion efforts)." 
    You checked the level of surface contamination of the existing paint. 

    Greetings. 

    Greetings.

  • Donald Dancey

    Donald

    Donald Dancey

    President at Innovative Painting & Waterproofing, Inc

    Anne, 
    Seems your doing everything right. Another 5 years of R & D and you might be able to catch up with the US suppliers

  • Tony LaGrange

    Tony

    Tony LaGrange

    President at Quantum Group of Companies

    Annie

    You are introducing air bubbles into the film when you spray. This is lowering the cohesive strength of the film.

  • James Hall

    James

    James Hall

    Engineering Technician, Chemist, Formulator, Manager

    Tony and David may be right, but there is something else to consider. 

    A polyurethane is the product of the reaction between a polyisocyanate and a polyol, forming a thermoset polymer. If an amine is used instead of a polyol, then a polyurea is formed instead. The main difference in properties between a polyurethane and a polyurea is the amount of hydrogen bonding. The polyurethane has one pendant hydrogen than can hydrogen bond with the carbonyl oxygen, while the polyurea has two. This leads to increased rigidity in a polyurea as long as other factors are the same. It also means that polyurea cohesive strength is enhanced at the expense of the adhesive strength being diminished. The level of hydrogen bonding in a polyurethane allows for higher hardness in low stress conditions and higher flexibility and tensile strength in high stress conditions than would otherwise be expected. The combination of hardness and flexibility gives the polyurethanes the toughness that provides significant advantages over other thermoset chemistries such as polyureas and epoxies. 

    The name polyaspartics has recently become popular among formulators in the industry due to the need to differentiate it from polyureas and polyurethanes. By definition, a polyaspartic is an aliphatic polyurea because it is the reaction of an aliphatic polyisocyanate with a polyaspartic ester - which is an aliphatic diamine. However, polyaspartic coatings are very different in both application and coating performance properties from conventional polyureas. For example, polyaspartics allow the formulator to control the rate of reaction and cure, thus, potlife of the two-component mixture can range from five minutes to two hours. While spray application techniques include the use of plural component spray equipment, many applications can be applied with conventional sprayers, making application much less complicated and less prone to error. 

    Bottom line - polyaspartics are polyureas with better application characteristices and polyureas as a class have poor adhestion characteristics due to their chemical structures. This means they have poor adhestion to the substrate and to themselves, and other coatings have poor adhesion to them. Adhesion is an issue, repairability is an issue, and compatibility with other coatings is an issue.

     David Bradham likes this

  • Gary

    Gary Jodzis

    Commercial Territory Manager at PPG Industries

    Depending on the length of static mixing line you may be cooking the pot life of the product prior to application thus diminishing the adhesive properties. Lower the heat on the supply lines and reapply / re-test.

     David Bradham likes this
Annie Qing
 
  • Frost

     

    Frost

    Owner, FBI Solutions Ltd

    It's the last line of James Hall's excellent technical summary that says it all for me. 

    In my experience with current polyaspartic primer/finishes, including their research and development, I'm surprised it's being applied over a polyurethane at all. Polyaspartic adhesion is usually best straight on to a blast cleaned profile for benign environments (up to C3 - ISO 12944), or over an approved zinc rich primer if we're talking about more aggressive environments - C4/C5. 

    Typical product technical data sheets also highlight the need for very thorough abrasion of polyaspartic if it is to be applied over itself, and I've been involved with 3 cases now of polyaspartic inter-coat adhesion failure and detachment. Does your paint supplier formally approve of its use over a polyurethane? 

    I'd certainly consult with the paint manufacturer involved, as to me, I'd be questioning the correctness of this specification, unless you have radically improved or advanced polyaspartic technology out there. 

    Finally, polyaspartic pot life is very sensitive to increase in relative humidity. Just check your environmentals at the time of spray application. Also, was it airless or conventional, as the latter could also give you some issues if the compressed air contained excess moisture. I'd always opt for airless spray with this technology. 

    Good luck, in any event!

     David Bradham likes this
  • Annie Qing

    Annie Qing

    Polyaspartic Polyurea Resin/Hardener Manufacturer Overseas Biz Manager at Feiyang Novel Materials export@feiyang.com.cn

    Top Contributor

    Hi, All, sorry, was on business trip last week. 

    @ David, thanks for your professional reply, "could indicate that there may be a mix problem or an air entrainment into the mix? " this is also reason that we suppose. As 2K Graco spraying equipment is mainly for quick 2K polyurethane, if apply polyaspartic spraying formulation, it must be problem of mixing completely.We are thinking two method: 
    1. Decrease viscosity through hardener, and additives. 
    2. Change longer mixing pipe of Graco 2K spraying equipment. 

    @ Alvaro, surely, mid coat is 100% polyurethane, but no pre-treatment on surface, as time is limited, after mid coat cure completely, top polyaspartic coat should be finished. We suppose no need to do surface treatment on mid coat, and it's not adhesion problem to mid coat, just cohesion in topcoat film itself.

  • Annie Qing

    Annie Qing

    Polyaspartic Polyurea Resin/Hardener Manufacturer Overseas Biz Manager at Feiyang Novel Materials export@feiyang.com.cn

    Top Contributor

    @ James, you offers good conception towards polyurethane, polyurea and polyaspartic. 
    Those three types is nowadays popular in protective coating. In my opinion, each types have it's own feature, depends on certain requirement of application. Sometimes, one type materials has good physical feature, but in certain application it would be disadvantage. 

    Finally, polyaspartic has good compatibility with epoxy, polyurethane and polyurea coat, but honestly adhesion to substrate is not so good as epoxy. 

    We need to clear feature of each materials, then can choice exact satisfied solution to project.

     David Bradham likes this
  • Annie Qing

    Annie Qing

    Polyaspartic Polyurea Resin/Hardener Manufacturer Overseas Biz Manager at Feiyang Novel Materials export@feiyang.com.cn

    Top Contributor

    @ Donald, thanks. We are always improving ourselves, and would like to learn more from you all, applicators. Let's work tog.

     David Bradham likes this
  • Annie Qing

    Annie Qing

    Polyaspartic Polyurea Resin/Hardener Manufacturer Overseas Biz Manager at Feiyang Novel Materials export@feiyang.com.cn

    Top Contributor

    @ Gary, thanks for your suggestion, actually we tried to change longer static mixing line, but it not possible, we hardly change construction equipment of end applicator. So now problem is we need to formulate another suitable formulation to fit this construction way.

  • Annie Qing

    Annie Qing

    Polyaspartic Polyurea Resin/Hardener Manufacturer Overseas Biz Manager at Feiyang Novel Materials export@feiyang.com.cn

    Top Contributor

    @ Tony, definitely, you offer exact point.

www.polyaspartic-polyurea.com
www.feiyangpaint.com
Contact: Ms Annie Qing 
Mail: export@feiyang.com.cn
Tel: +86 75536694812 or +86 18675621988

Company Details

Bronze Gleitlager

,

Bronze Sleeve Bushings

 and 

Graphite Plugged Bushings

 from Quality China Factory

  • Business Type:

    Manufacturer,Distributor/Wholesaler,Exporter,Seller

  • Year Established:

    1992

  • Total Annual:

    80，000，000-100，000，000

  • Employee Number:

    100~500

  • Ecer Certification：

    Site Member

Shenzhen Feiyang Protech Corp., Ltd. is a holding company of Zhuhai Feiyang Novel Materials Corp., Ltd ( founded in 1992 ). It is a national high-tech leading polyaspartic material researcher and manufacturer in China with strong R&D capacity. With 20 years development, Feiyang owns many te... Shenzhen Feiyang Protech Corp., Ltd. is a holding company of Zhuhai Feiyang Novel Materials Corp., Ltd ( founded in 1992 ). It is a national high-tech leading polyaspartic material researcher and manufacturer in China with strong R&D capacity. With 20 years development, Feiyang owns many te...

+ Read More

Get in touch with us

  • Reach Us
  • Shenzhen Feiyang Protech Corp., Ltd.
  • Shenzhen Headquarter: Feiyang Tech-Park, Longchang Road 8, Bao'an Dist, Shenzhen City, China (export@feiyang.com.cn)
  • https://www.polyaspartic-polyurea.com/

Leave a Message, we will call you back quickly!

Email

Check your email

Phone Number

Check your phone number

Requirement Details

Your message must be between 20-3,000 characters!

Submit Requirement

Trade Alert - Delivering the latest product trends and industry news straight to your inbox.

Home Categories About Us
RFQ Report IPR products Privacy Policy Sitemap

© 2026 Chinax.com. All rights reserved.